The Workday Adaptive Alternative for Enterprise FP&A

The Adaptive Alternative Built for Planning at Enterprise Scale.

Enterprise teams choose Fintastic as their Workday Adaptive alternative when revenue planning still lives in Excel, operational planning is out of reach, and every model change requires consultant support. See how Fintastic compares to Adaptive and why teams are making the switch.

See the Full Comparison
4.7/5 Rating★★★★★★★★★★
Cloud Extended Planning and Analysis Solutions
GartnerPeer Insights

"Fintastic has transformed how we approach forecast and scenario planning. The backend engine is lightning fast and deeply customizable."

Data & Analytics Leader, Travel & Hospitality

"The tool is more intuitive and flexible than other tools I have used. The team is very responsive."

Finance Leader, Travel & Hospitality

"Easily integrated with our other systems (HRIS, Salesforce, NetSuite) with the ability to create a rolling forecast."

Finance Leader, Software Industry

"Fintastic provides the flexibility in data display and analysis within the system, much more user friendly than the other planning tools we've used previously."

Finance Leader, Software Industry

"We've had a very positive experience with Fintastic. The level of customer support and technical assistance has been impressive, and implementation was easy and successful."

Finance Leader, Software Industry

"The tool is very intuitive and easy to understand. The vendor is very helpful and prompt with questions and concerns about the product."

Finance Leader, Travel & Hospitality

Talk to Our Team

Trusted By
Elevate Sports Ventures
NinjaOne
Agoda
o9
BestEgg
Celigo
Gigamon
Nextech
Wind River
Aviatrix
Artlist
Claroty
Side by Side

Fintastic vs Adaptive: A Side-by-Side Comparison.

Outcome
Fintastic
Workday Adaptive Planning
Plan at any level of detail
✓Yes
Build plans at any level of detail without the model bogging down, and change how a plan is structured anytime without rebuilding it.
◐Partial
Built mainly for financial plans and handles them well, but the model gets slower as the data grows and gets more detailed.
Stays fast when the whole team is in
✓Yes
The whole team can work in the plan at once during crunch periods, and updates show up for everyone right away.
✗No
Tends to slow down when the data is large and a lot of people are working at the same time.
Finance, sales, and ops plan together
✓Yes
Finance, revenue, headcount, and operational plans all live in one place and stay connected, so the numbers always tie out.
◐Partial
Strong for finance. Other teams run in separate add-on modules, and much of the operational planning still ends up back in spreadsheets.
AI that works across all your data
✓Yes
Ask questions in plain English and get answers pulled from your live plan, with the same access rules your team already has.
◐Partial
Adds AI for forecasting, flagging unusual numbers, and a chat assistant, but it works mainly on the financial model rather than everything together.
You own the platform, not your consultants
✓Yes
Your own team builds and changes the model, including people who aren't technical. No outside consultant needed to make updates.
✗No
Usually set up through a consulting partner, and teams often keep paying them to make changes later.
Control who sees what, down to the cell
✓Yes
Decide exactly what each person or team can see, right down to specific rows and columns.
✗No
Access can be limited, but only in broad strokes, and group settings can override individual ones. You can't hide specific columns, and tight limits can break financial reports.
Value in weeks, not months
✓Yes
Most teams go live in 12-16 weeks, with their first reports live in 3-4 weeks.

✗No
Usually takes around 4-5 months to get the financial model live, with a consulting partner involved.

Pricing you can predict
✓Yes
One subscription based on company size. Unlimited users and data, support included, no surprise add-ons.
✗No
Priced by platform fee, number of seats, and separate modules, with consulting costs often added on top.

Run unlimited scenarios
✓Yes
Spin up as many what-if versions as you want, each kept separate, with no hit to speed.
◐Partial
You can build scenarios, but running a lot of them adds to the slowdowns on large plans.
See the full range of outcomes
✓Yes
Model best case, worst case, and everything in between, so you can plan around the odds instead of a single guess.
✗No
Models one scenario at a time, with no built-in way to see the full range of possible outcomes.

What Finance Leaders Say About Fintastic

Hear directly from finance teams using Fintastic to plan faster, work with more detail, and make decisions with greater confidence.

In my finance career, it’s rare to see an interconnected platform of this scale support iterative scenario planning without sacrificing speed or reliability. Fintastic has been a meaningful addition for Priceline.

Marc Culver
VP of Finance at Priceline

Before implementing Fintastic, business stakeholders couldn't easily create or maintain scenarios. Now there are multiple scenarios that are easily managed and compared, allowing us to plan ahead and make more data-driven decisions.

Emmanuel Blum
Director of FP&A at Claroty

Artlist reduced time spent on their BVA (budget vs. actual) reporting cycle by 70% - with analysis available at PO-level granularity, always live, with no manual consolidation required.

Evyatar Talev
FP&A Manager at Artlist

Fintastic has been a game changer for our FP&A team! What used to take us days can now be done in mere minutes.

Tom Nguyen
VP Finance at Aviatrix

See Fintastic in Action.

The clearest way to understand the difference is to see your own planning model run on it. Book a demo with our team.

Request a Demo